{"id":1609,"date":"2017-08-30T19:22:46","date_gmt":"2017-08-30T19:22:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bgfs2018.wpengine.com\/?p=1609"},"modified":"2017-08-30T19:22:46","modified_gmt":"2017-08-30T19:22:46","slug":"the-complexity-conundrumasis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/the-complexity-conundrumasis\/","title":{"rendered":"The Complexity Conundrum"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As I had a conversation with a client today, I came to realise just how complex some areas of legislation have become in recent years.<\/p>\n<p>It seems that there is a trend for adding new elements to existing legislation or &#8216;retro-fitting&#8217; old rules to fit current circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>The problem with both approaches, is that it leads to rules that are confusing and complex and which are often not really fit for purpose.<\/p>\n<p>A great example is Inheritance Tax. Where as before, we had the &#8216;usual&#8217; \u00a3325,000 nil rate band which I think many people had become reasonably comfortable with, we now have the new &#8216;Residential Nil Rate Band&#8217; which is a great example of things being bolted onto existing legislation.<\/p>\n<p>This new allowance looks innocent enough on the surface &#8211; a further \u00a3175,000 of IHT exempt assets sounds good to most people &#8211; however when you start to dig a bit deeper, things are not quite what they seem.<\/p>\n<p>For a start, the new allowance only applies to a select number of people, namely those who own a home worth more than \u00a3350,000 (as a couple, \u00a3175,000 for a single person) and whom have children. This alone rules out a reasonably large portion of the population. Add in the fact that the allowance starts to taper down on a 2:1 basis when your estate exceeds \u00a32m and many types of trusts commonly in wills are also excluded from claiming this allowance, and we end up in a situation where it is thought only around 5% of the population will be eligible to claim. There are many other nuances which are beyond the scope of this article, but which muddy the water even further.<\/p>\n<p>Now on the one hand, you could argue that this is a political masterstroke &#8211; the government achieved the headlines of a \u00a31 million IHT allowance and the media seemed happy. On the other hand however, it has introduced a huge amount of additional complexity into what was already a far from simple area of financial planning.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps one day policy makers will realise that sometimes it really is better to rip up the existing rule book and start again &#8211; then again they may not!<\/p>\n<p>Until then, we will do our very best to cut through the complexity on behalf of our clients&#8217; and to present solutions which are as clear and easy to understand as possible.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As I had a conversation with a client today, I came to realise just how complex some areas of legislation have become in recent years. It seems that there is a trend for adding new elements to existing legislation or &#8216;retro-fitting&#8217; old rules to fit current circumstances. The problem with both approaches, is that it&#8230;  <a class=\"excerpt-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/the-complexity-conundrumasis\/\" title=\"ReadThe Complexity Conundrum\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-estate-planning","wp-sticky"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1609"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1609\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.buckinghamgate.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}